When one stops cycling I repeat steps 3-5. I then go back to ratting on my second screen and occasionally glance back to make sure all my strip miners are still cycing. Then I cycle through the targeting and module videoFX instances, matching up strip miners with rocks. I hold ctrl and then click around so that all my ships lock onto a few promising rocks. The results of these are all displayed on the main screen. Once they've arrived and settled I hit another button and they all fire off their survey scanners. I then navigate the menu to a waypoint at a belt and they all warp. I have a small repeater region where I right click and it is broadcasted to all my ships. On the main screen I hit undock and all the ships undock. The following is how I operate the system. Sadly, I'll admit it basically turned mining into a game of whack-a-mole.
#Lavish software isboxer windows#
Jokes aside, with some clever VideoFX and repeater region I have turned my mining operation into a silly screen of modules, survey scanner results, targeting windows and cargo holds. Just to add to the OPs information, I multibox with 3 mining accounts and a ratter/mission runner who runs a protection racket against the 3 miners. You are still playing the same game with the same rules as everyone else! ISBoxer also does not affect game mechanics. A bot needs its own senses to see what is happening in the game in order to respond to it, and it needs its own ability to respond to it. You're at the controls making every movement happen, and nothing is happening without your eyeballs and ears doing the sensing, and your hands (and feet?) doing the button mashing. So it's not doing anything inherently against the TOS. Inner Space is "in the process", but so is countless other software including gaming overlay software like, say, X-Fire or Mumble. Then there's ISBoxer which programs it for multiboxing, and people tell me they enjoy it so I think it does it well.Īs far as the TOS goes, Inner Space and ISBoxer are not game specific, it doesn't touch the game environment or know anything about it. This is just a somewhat open, programmable gaming platform. Well there's two things here, first of all the Inner Space platform. I've been in business since 2004 as a small independent software publisher at, promoting gaming-related tools that hopefully are used for good. I'm hoping that my $1000 EVE multiboxing video contest will help show how boring it really is, or conversely why people are actually excited about what I spend my time creating for them. Thank you CCP for so far directing your wrath at the bots rather than multiboxers. Just playing their accounts together and having some interesting toys to play with, like being able to see or control another window without alt+tabbing from the one they are playing. Most of my customers are big fans of the games they play, and pay extra just to keep playing, because they enjoy the hobby, and are not interested in getting banned. So it is an easy business decision for me to support multiboxers and not botters in any case. There's a lot more multiboxers than people who want to risk botting, and most botters will screw you (me) in a heartbeat. The botters simply don't trust me to protect them from Blizzard (or CCP in this case), because it would be counter-productive for me to do that. Blizzard banned bots that happened to use my software, and I had some discussions with them and in the end, they still ban bots and are not banning people for simply using ISBoxer. Lelouch updated a post last month regarding multiboxing to reiterate the EULA, which legitimate multiboxers agree to and we mutually promote.įor me the current atmosphere feels like WoW in 2008. Recently CCP has been detecting and banning bots and hacks, leading some to question whether ISBoxer itself is banned, particularly with some botters/hackers trying to claim they were just using ISBoxer.
0 kommentar(er)
